EFFECTIVENESS OF PREPRODUCTION ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
Keywords:
information technology, preproduction engineering, management effectiveness, customized management methodologyAbstract
The paper presents the results of research and development of the tools for preproduction engineering management and determination of its effetiveness at mechanical engineering enterprises.
Research object – preproduction engineering processes.
Research aim – development of the model of management index estimation, taking into account characteristic features of mechanical engineering enterprises.
Today, one of the means to increase an enterprise competitiveness is proactive work, which consists in elaboration of such management methodology that integrates tools, processes and knowledge of the existing management methodologies with the knowledge, tools and processes of preproduction engineering at the mechanical engineering enterprises, i. e. elaboration of a customized management methodology.
At the same time, one of the main preproduction methodology directions is automation of management and decision making processes, based on creation and application of IT technologies and systems. Integrated CAD / CAM / CAE and PDM systems provide automation of the most production processes.
To solve the problems related to calculating the span of control of preproduction engineering processes, a structural approach is used to provide operational analysis of the main elements of the enterprise subdivisions activities and their interrelations.
We propose to expand the “span of control” notion by introducing a management index Im that takes into account complexity of the new relationship within preproduction engineering and makes it possible to calculate statistical time indices for the functions, which describe decision making operations in simulation models.
A model has been developed for calculating the number of employees required to ensure effective preproduction engineering processes.
References
2. Жук К. Д. Исследование структуры и моделирование логико-динамических систем / К. Д. Жук, А. А. Тимченко, Т. И. Доленко. – К. : Наук. думка, 1975. – 197 с.
3. Фрэнк Харари. Теория графов./ Фрэнк Харари . – М. : Эдиториал УРСС, 2003. – 296 с.
4. Мильнер Б. З. Теория организации. / Б. З. Мильнер. – 2-е издание, переработанное и дополненное. – М. : ИНФРА-М, 2000. – 655 с.
5. Павленко П. М. Метод відбору ключових показників ефективності технологічної підготовки виробництва / П. М. Павленко, А. О. Хлевний // Вісник інженерної академії України. – 2013. – № 3–4. – С. 189–194.
6. Хлевний А. О. Метод оцінки якості системи управління технологічною підготовкою виробництва / А. О. Хлевний // Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. – 2013. – № 4. – C. 85–92.
============REFERENCES===========
1. Tesla I. M. Khlevna I. L, Khlevnyy A. O. (8-10 November 2016) Scientific and methodological principles of meta-methodology impact on project management based on the concept of non-coercive interaction. Proceedings of the III International scientific-practical conference "Information technologies and interaction" : Kiev, P. 113-115.
2. Zhuk, K. D., Timchenko A. A., Dolenko T. I. Investigation of the structure and modeling of logic-dynamic systems. Kyiv, Science. Dumka. 1975. 197 p.
3. Harari, Frank. Graph theory. Lane. From English. Ed. V. P. Kozyrev, G. P. Gavrilova. 2nd. Moscow, Editorial URSS. 2003.296 p. (in Russian).
4. Mylner B. Z. Organization theory. Second edition, revised and enlarged. Moscow, INFRA-M. 2000. 655 p. (in Russian).
5. Pavlenko P., Khlevnyy A. The method of selection of key performance indicators of technological preparation of production. Journal of Engineering Academy of Ukraine. 2013. N 3-4.P.189-194.
6. Khlevnyy A. A method for evaluating the quality control system of production. Journal of Khmelnitsky National University. 2013. N 4. P.85-92.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 165
